Investment Insights • December 14, 2025
Rain Industries: The Dynamics of a Turnaround
How Rate Cuts, Tariffs, and Asset Scarcity Converge for Deep Value
Table of Contents
Rain Industries operates a business model that is frequently mischaracterized by the broader market as a simple commodity chemical play. A deeper operational analysis reveals a complex "Industrial Upcycler" model that sits at the critical choke points of the global energy, aluminum, and steel supply chains.
The company creates value through arbitrage—acquiring heavy, hazardous industrial by-products (Green Petroleum Coke from refineries and Coal Tar from steel blast furnaces) and converting them into essential, high-specification raw materials without which the aluminum industry cannot function.
"If the world requires aluminum, it requires CPC. Crucially, there is currently no commercially viable substitute."
Global Asset Footprint
- Carbon Assets (CPC) ~2.4 MT Capacity
- Locations: Lake Charles (USA), Robinson (USA), Vizag (India), China
- Advanced Materials Global Leader
- Locations: Integrated Distillation Complexes in Germany & Belgium
- Cement Assets 4.0 MT Capacity
- Locations: Kurnool & Nalgonda (South India)
Supply Chain Dynamics & Scarcity
CPC: The "Conductor"
The chain begins at oil refineries. The heavy "bottom-of-the-barrel" sludge is sent to a coking unit to produce Green Petroleum Coke (GPC). Rain acquires this raw material and processes it in rotary kilns at 1350°C. This calcination increases carbon density, creating the CPC needed to conduct electricity in aluminum smelters.
Historically abundant, GPC is now scarce. Refineries are optimizing output to produce "Needle Coke" for the booming EV Battery market (graphite anodes). This shift creates a permanent shortage of the anode-grade GPC that aluminum smelters rely on.
CTP: The "Binder"
The chain originates in Blast Furnace (BF) steelmaking. When coal is baked into metallurgical coke, a liquid by-product called Coal Tar is produced. Rain distills this tar into Coal Tar Pitch (CTP), which acts as the "glue" binding CPC particles in anodes.
The raw material is facing a "Cliff." As the West decarbonizes, coal-belching Blast Furnaces are shutting down in favor of Electric Arc Furnaces (EAF), which produce zero coal tar. Rain's primary feedstock is structurally disappearing from Western markets.
Structural Threats & Defensive Moats
The EV Battery Effect
The Problem
Refineries are optimizing output for EV batteries ("Needle Coke"), creating a structural shortage of anode-grade Green Petroleum Coke (GPC) for the aluminum industry.
The Mitigation: "Blending Moat"
Rain invested in proprietary technology to process a diverse "soup" of lower-grade GPC that the battery industry ignores. By using Vertical Shaft Calciners, they convert discounted waste into high-spec CPC, securing feedstock when competitors cannot.
The Green Steel Shift
The Problem
As the West shuts down Blast Furnaces to decarbonize, the supply of Coal Tar (Rain's raw material) is structurally disappearing.
The Mitigation: "Petro-Tar Pivot"
Rain developed technology to distill Petroleum Tar as a substitute. Simultaneously, the shift to Electric Arc Furnaces increases demand for CTP (for electrodes). Supply shrinks, demand grows, and Rain controls the substitute.
The Counter-Cyclical Allocator
To accurately evaluate Rain Industries, one must analyze it not as a standard corporate entity but as a Leveraged Buyout (LBO) Vehicle. The promoter, Jagan Mohan Reddy, functions less as an operations manager and more as a sophisticated capital allocator.
His strategy is distinct: identify distressed or undervalued global assets that are market leaders in niche segments (Carbon/Chemicals). He acquires these assets using debt raised on the target’s own balance sheet (non-recourse to the Indian parent). He then terms out this debt and aggressively pays it down using operating cash flows when the commodity cycle turns upward. This creates a compounding effect for equity holders: as debt vanishes, the equity value expands disproportionately.
The Double-Edged Sword: Risks of the LBO Model
While the LBO strategy amplifies returns during upcycles, it introduces significant fragility during downcycles. High leverage means fixed interest burdens remain even when EBITDA collapses (as seen in 2023-24). This creates a risk of debt covenant breaches or refinancing difficulties if credit markets freeze, turning a liquidity issue into a solvency crisis. The success of this model depends entirely on the timing of the cycle turn.
The Acquisition Track Record
CII Carbon LLC
2007$595 Million Acquisition. Paid 5.5x - 6.0x EV/EBITDA when comparable global assets traded at 8x-10x.
Acquired the 2nd largest calciner in the world just before the 2008 commodity super-cycle. Cash flows were used to rapidly pay down debt. By 2011, ROE expanded to 31%.
Rütgers N.V.
2013€702 Million (~$912M) Acquisition. Paid ~6.5x EV/EBITDA when specialty chemical firms traded at 9x-11x.
Became the world leader in Coal Tar Pitch (CTP). This diversification made Rain the only player globally to produce both critical components of the aluminum anode (CPC + Pitch).
Internal Growth & Expansion
Global Debottlenecking (2018-2024)
Invested $200-300 Million in internal growth, including the Vertical Shaft Calciner (India) and HHCR Resins (Germany). This "Silent Acquisition" phase is complete, freeing up future cash flows.
The Domestic Anchor: Cement Expansion (2024)
Recently, Rain announced a ₹750 Cr expansion in its Cement division. Unlike the global LBOs, this expansion is funded internally on a debt-free balance sheet. This demonstrates the nuance in the promoter's strategy: aggressive leverage is used for global dollar assets, while domestic rupee assets are managed conservatively to provide a stable, zero-debt cash flow floor.
The Eras of Rain: 2008 to 2025
Era 1: The Golden Age (2008-2013)
Peak ROCEThis period, immediately following the CII Carbon acquisition (2007), serves as the definitive proof-of-concept for the Rain model. As the commodity super-cycle took hold, the company transformed high financial leverage into extraordinary returns on capital. The asset quality shone through, with the company consistently generating returns far above its cost of capital.
Consistent return above cost of capital for 5 years.
The compounding effect of leverage + earnings growth.
Era 2: The "Blue Sky" Super-Cycle (2017-2018)
Supply ShockThe trigger here was regulatory, not economic. In 2017, China implemented its "Blue Sky" policy, physically shutting down polluting domestic calciners during winter months. This removed significant global supply of CPC. Rain, with compliant assets in the West, saw an explosion in realization per tonne. This era teaches a critical lesson: Rain's profitability peaks not when demand is linear, but when global supply is constrained.
Operating profit surged ~50% from 2016 levels.
Driven by global CPC scarcity.
Era 3a: Post-COVID Inventory Boom (2021-2022)
Pricing PowerFollowing the pandemic, global supply chains snarled. Freight rates skyrocketed, and physical availability of raw materials became the only metric that mattered. Smelters, desperate to keep pots running, paid any price for Carbon. Rain capitalized on this panic buying, achieving its highest-ever operational performance. This was a classic "Inventory Super-Cycle" where customers over-ordered to buffer against logistics failures.
Surpassed even the 2018 Blue Sky peak.
Driven by price realizations, not just volume.
Era 3b: The "Perfect Storm" Crisis (2023-2024)
Deep DistressThe euphoria of 2022 reversed violently. The Russia-Ukraine war sent European natural gas prices up 10x, making Rain's German advanced materials operations cash-negative. Simultaneously, the US Federal Reserve hiked rates to ~5.3%, doubling Rain's interest burden just as it had to refinance. Customers, realizing they held too much inventory from 2022, stopped buying completely (Destocking). This trifecta—Energy Shock, Interest Shock, and Demand Collapse—crushed earnings and triggered the tax deductibility limits, exacerbating cash burn.
Lowest operational profit in a decade.
Reported massive book losses due to operating deleverage.
Era 4: Fortress America (2025 Onwards)
The RenaissanceWe are now entering a new structural reality. With the Trump administration signaling aggressive tariffs, a protective wall is being built around US manufacturing assets. Rain’s US plants (Lake Charles, Robinson) effectively operate on a "pricing island," insulated from Chinese dumping. As US smelters run at capacity behind this tariff shield, Rain’s strategic US assets are poised for another upcycle, this time driven by trade policy rather than raw material shortages.
The Cycle Visualized: EBIT & Return on Capital
Figure 2: Financial Cycles (2008 - 2025)
A combination chart titled 'THE CYCLE VISUALIZED: EBIT & RETURN ON CAPITAL', labeled as 'Figure 2: Financial Cycles (2008 - 2025)'.
The chart tracks two metrics over a long timeline (2007–2024) to show cyclicality:
- Primary Y-Axis (Left): Measures EBIT ($M) (Earnings Before Interest and Taxes) ranging from $0 to $400, represented by grey vertical bars.
- Secondary Y-Axis (Right): Measures ROCE (%) (Return on Capital Employed) ranging from 0% to 30%, represented by a dashed black line with hollow circle markers.
Key Phases of the Cycle:
- Early Highs (2007–2008): The period begins with high returns. ROCE starts at its peak of ~27% in 2007, while EBIT jumps to ~$240M in 2008.
- The 2011 Rebound: After a dip, there is a sharp recovery in 2011. EBIT rises to ~$270M and ROCE spikes back up to ~25%.
- Mid-Cycle Stagnation (2012–2020): A long period of volatility follows. EBIT generally fluctuates between $100M and $250M, while ROCE hovers between 10% and 15%.
- The 2022 Peak: The grey bar for 2022 is the tallest on the chart, indicating record earnings of ~$360M. However, ROCE is lower than previous peaks, sitting at ~17%.
- The Crash (2023): A dramatic collapse occurs. EBIT plummets to less than $50M, and ROCE hits its all-time low of ~2%.
- Recovery (2024): A slight upturn is visible at the end, with EBIT rising to ~$80M and ROCE recovering to ~5%.
The Hidden Asset: Anatomy of the Tax Trap
The Origin Event: The "Rate Shock" of August 2023
To understand the opportunity, we must first understand the crisis. In August 2023, Rain faced a wall of maturity for its long-term debt. Unfortunately, this coincided with the most aggressive global interest rate hiking cycle in decades. While benchmarks like EURIBOR had been negative since 2015 and LIBOR was near 1% in 2017, by 2023, rates had exploded.
The Analogy: Think of a homeowner whose low fixed-rate mortgage expires exactly when national interest rates hit a 20-year peak. They are forced to remortgage at the new, punishing rates, causing their monthly payments to double overnight, even though the loan amount hasn't changed.
The Interest Disconnect: Rates Fall, Costs Stay High
Figure 3: Quarterly Interest Expense (₹ Cr) vs. Fed Funds Rate (%)
A dual-axis combination chart titled 'THE INTEREST DISCONNECT: RATES FALL, COSTS STAY HIGH' labeled as 'Figure 3'. It tracks quarterly performance from Q1 2022 to Q3 2025.
The chart contrasts two financial metrics:
- Fed Funds Rate (%) (Black Line): Starts near 0% in Q1 2022 and rises sharply to a plateau of ~5.3% by Q3 2023. From Q3 2024 onwards, the rate begins to decline, dropping to approximately 3.75% by Q3 2025.
- Interest Expense (₹ Cr) (Bars): Represented by vertical bars that shift from light grey to dark grey. Expenses start at ~115 Cr in Q1 2022 and rise steadily. Unlike the Fed Rate, the interest expense does not drop in the later quarters; it plateaus at a high of ~230 Cr through Q3 2025, creating a visual disconnect.
Key Annotations:
- A callout box highlights the core insight: 'Divergence: Fed Rates ↓ (Line) vs. Costs → (Bars). March 2026 Refi is the convergence catalyst.'
- A caption at the bottom reinforces this: 'Fed Rates down ~155 bps since peak, but Interest Costs remain elevated. March 2026 is the convergence point.
The New Burden (Aug 2023)
- 2029 Senior Notes ($450M): Issued at a fixed rate of 12.25%.
- Euro Term Loan B (€353M): Repriced at EURIBOR + 5%.
The Mechanism: The Section 163(j) Tax Trap
In the US and Germany, tax laws (like Section 163(j)) cap the tax-deductibility of interest expenses at roughly 30% of EBITDA.
In 2023-24, Rain faced a double anomaly:
1. Interest Spiked (Numerator went up).
2. EBITDA Collapsed (Denominator went down).
Result: The company lost the ability to deduct its massive interest bill from its taxable income. This created "Phantom Income," forcing Rain to pay ~₹538 Cr in cash taxes despite reporting book losses.
Carryforward of disallowed interest + Net Operating Losses. Currently written down to zero on the Balance Sheet.
The Catalyst: March 2026
Calculating The Savings
Expected Rate Reduction = 2.5% to 3.0%
-----------------------------------------
Annual Interest Savings = $20 Million - $24 Million (₹160-200 Cr)
The 2029 Notes become callable in March 2026. Refinancing at lower rates (post-Fed cuts) achieves two goals:
1. Direct Savings: Lowers the interest bill by ~$20-25M annually as calculated above.
2. Tax Unlock: Lower interest brings the expense back under the 30% EBITDA cap. Rain will likely pay Zero Cash Tax for the first 1-2 years of profitability by utilizing these hidden assets.
This creates a "Virtuous Deleveraging Cycle":
Lower Interest -> Higher Free Cash Flow -> Faster Debt Repayment -> Even Lower Interest Costs.
The Margin of Safety: Replacement Cost
Executive Summary: The Deep Value Proposition
"Rain Industries is currently available at a ~70% discount to the conservative replacement cost of its assets. The market is pricing in distress, ignoring the strategic value of global market leadership."
Building these assets from scratch today is not just expensive—it is practically impossible. Environmental regulations in the West act as a formidable barrier to entry, making existing permits invaluable.
1. Carbon Assets (CPC)
The "Moat of Dirt": New calciners in the US are virtually impossible to permit due to strict SOx/NOx regulations. Replacement cost estimates are based on recent greenfield projects in less regulated jurisdictions like the Middle East, adjusted for US inflation and the massive "permitting premium" of operating in developed markets.
2. Advanced Materials
Specialized Infrastructure: This segment involves complex, integrated distillation towers in Castrop-Rauxel (Germany) and Zelzate (Belgium). These assets were acquired for ~$912M in 2013. Even with a conservative 35% inflation adjustment over 12 years (ignoring the far higher real construction inflation in Europe), the replacement value is substantial.
3. Cement Assets
Standard brownfield replacement cost in South India. These are stable, cash-generating assets with zero debt, providing a domestic floor to the valuation.
Case Study in Difficulty: The Vizag Expansion
For much of the last decade, Rain’s profitability in India was hamstrung by a 2018 Supreme Court ruling that banned petcoke imports for fuel use. Although Rain uses petcoke as a chemical feedstock, the resulting quota system (capped at 1.4 Million Tonnes globally for India) severely diluted Rain’s allocation. Its flagship Vizag plant, located in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ), was starved of raw materials and faced barriers selling into the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA).
The Resolution (2024-25): This bottleneck has finally been resolved. The Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) recommended increasing the national import cap from 1.4 MT to 1.9 MT. This 500,000-tonne increase acts as a massive relief valve, allowing Rain to secure sufficient feedstock to ramp up Vizag utilization toward 90%. This case study proves that even for an existing player, regulatory hurdles can take 7 years to clear—making new entrant supply virtually impossible.
Market Cap vs. Asset Reality
Trading at ~30 cents on the dollar of replacement value.
A horizontal bar chart titled 'MARKET CAP VS. ASSET REALITY' comparing the company's stock market value against its physical asset value.
The chart uses three bars of varying lengths to visualize the gap:
- Gross Asset Value: The longest bar (light grey) at the top, extending to approximately $2.5 Billion, representing the total value of assets before depreciation.
- Net Asset Value (NAV): The middle bar (dark grey), reaching roughly $1.5 Billion, representing the book value of assets.
- Current Market Cap: The shortest bar (solid black) at the bottom, reaching just under $0.5 Billion (approx. $0.3B–$0.4B), indicating how the market currently values the company.
A caption at the bottom summarizes the investment thesis: 'Trading at ~30 cents on the dollar of replacement value.
The Threat Landscape: China's Deflationary Shock
The most significant risk facing the global commodity complex, including Rain Industries, is the specter of Deflation Exported by China. The collapse of the Chinese housing bubble has structurally impaired domestic demand for aluminum and its raw materials.
With local consumption plummeting, Chinese calciners are flooding global markets with excess CPC capacity at distressed prices. This dumping exerts immense downward pressure on realizations for unshielded players.
The Counter-Force: The Western Firewall
Western economies, led by the US, have moved decisively to protect their strategic industrial base. Through tariffs and non-tariff barriers, a "pricing wall" is being erected.
Rain's Carbon operations showed a distinct turnaround in the September 2025 quarter, suggesting that its US and European assets are successfully insulating themselves from Chinese price aggression.
Market Disconnect: Despite clear signs of a turnaround, Rain's stock is down ~35% since August 2025. This creates a potential for swift re-rating as financial performance catches up to operational reality.
Figure 4: Operating Profit Margin (%) Trend
A line chart labeled 'FIGURE 4: OPERATING PROFIT MARGIN (%) TREND' illustrating a distinct U-shaped recovery curve over an 11-quarter period.
The chart tracks Margin (%) on the vertical axis (0 to 16) against a quarterly timeline on the horizontal axis (Q1 2023 to Q3 2025).
The trend is divided into two clear phases:
- The Decline (2023): The period begins at the peak. Q1 2023 starts at 15%, dropping sharply and steadily each quarter: 12% in Q2, 8% in Q3, and 4% in Q4.
- The Bottom: The curve hits its lowest point (the trough) in Q1 2024 at 3%.
- The Recovery (2024–2025): From the low, the margin rebounds consistently. It rises to 5% in Q2 2024, 7% in Q3 2024, and 8% in Q4 2024. The upward momentum continues into 2025, reaching 10% in Q1, 12% in Q2, and ending at 14% in Q3 2025, nearly recovering to the initial peak levels.
Sensitivity: The Upside Scenarios
To quantify the asymmetry of the current opportunity, we model two distinct recovery scenarios based on Rain's historical Return on Assets (ROA). This framework allows us to look past near-term volatility and value the business based on normalized earnings power.
Base Case: "Normalized"
Assumption: A modest 10% Pre-Tax Return on Assets (conservative vs. historical avg).
Bull Case: "Upcycle"
Assumption: 16.5% ROA (consistent with 2011/2018 upcycles).
Implied P/E Ratio under recovery scenarios.
A vertical bar chart comparing valuation metrics under two different assumptions, with the subtitle 'Implied P/E Ratio under recovery scenarios.'.
The chart features two distinct bars on a y-axis labeled 'Price to Earnings (x)', ranging from 0.0 to 4.0. The x-axis identifies the two scenarios:
- Base Case (10% ROA): Represented by a light grey bar on the left, this scenario shows a higher valuation multiple of approximately 3.8x.
- Bull Case (16.5% ROA): Represented by a solid black bar on the right, this scenario indicates a lower, more attractive valuation multiple of approximately 1.9x.
The comparison illustrates that as Return on Assets (ROA) improves (from 10% to 16.5%), the implied Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio effectively drops by nearly half, making the valuation more compelling.
The Macro Endgame: Dollar Optionality
Beyond the micro-level turnaround, Rain Industries possesses a classic "Macro Call Option" embedded in its valuation. Historically, the company’s fortunes are inversely correlated with the strength of the US Dollar.
In the last major dollar downcycle (post-2002), Rain consistently achieved a 20% ROCE for more than half a decade. A weaker dollar typically ignites a broad commodity upcycle, inflating the price of Rain's end products (Calcined Coke, Pitch, Aluminum) faster than its input costs.
The "Lollapalooza" Setup
If the dollar enters a structural decline, Rain benefits from a triple tailwind:
1. Operational Leverage: Earnings explode as fixed costs are covered.
2. Financial Leverage: Excess cash flow rapidly pays down debt (Deleveraging).
3. Asset Revaluation: The replacement cost of its physical plants rises significantly in dollar terms.
This alignment of micro-recovery and macro-tailwind creates an asymmetric risk-reward profile rarely found in public markets.
Read our deep dive on the Dollar Cycle
The Next Plaza MomentRegulatory Disclosures & Disclaimers
Registration: Amaltas Asset Management LLP is a SEBI-registered Portfolio Management Service (PMS) with Registration Number INP000009126.
Ownership Disclosure: Amaltas Asset Management LLP, its partners, employees, and client portfolios managed by the firm may have significant long or short positions in the securities mentioned in this report (Rain Industries Limited). The firm may buy, sell, or hold these securities at any time without prior notice.
No Investment Advice: This document is prepared for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities. It is not intended to be a substitute for professional financial advice. The specific needs, investment objectives, and financial situation of any particular investor have not been considered. Investors should consult their financial advisors before making any investment decisions.
Risk Warning: Investment in securities market are subject to market risks. Read all the related documents carefully before investing. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The value of investments may go up or down depending on the factors and forces affecting the securities markets. There is no assurance or guarantee that the objectives of the portfolio will be achieved.
Data Accuracy: The information contained herein is based on sources believed to be reliable but has not been independently verified. Amaltas Asset Management LLP does not warrant the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the information. All opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice.
Standard Warning: "Registration granted by SEBI, membership of BASL (in case of IAs) and certification from NISM in no way guarantee performance of the intermediary or provide any assurance of returns to investors."
© 2025 Amaltas Asset Management LLP
